Knowing how to write a formal analysis of a work of art is a fundamental skill learned in an art appreciation-level class. Students in art history survey and upper-level classes further develop this skill. Use this sheet as a guide when writing a formal analysis paper.Consider the following when analyzing a work of art. Not everything applies to every work of art, nor is it always useful to consider things in the order given. In any analysis, keep in mind the following: HOW and WHY is this a significant work of art?
Part I – General Information
- In many cases, this information can be found on a label or in a gallery guidebook. There may be an artist’s statement available in the gallery. If so, indicate in your text or by a footnote or endnote to your paper where you got the information.
- Subject Matter (Who or What is Represented?)
- Artist or Architect (What person or group made it? Often this is not known. If there is a name, refer to this person as the artist or architect, not “author.” Refer to this person by their last name, not familiarly by their first name.)
- Date (When was it made? Is it a copy of something older? Was it made before or after other similar works?)
- Provenance (Where was it made? For whom? Is it typical of the art of a geographical area?)
- Location (Where is the work of art now? Where was it originally located? Does the viewer look up at it, or down at it? If it is not in its original location, does the viewer see it as the artist intended? Can it be seen on all sides, or just on one?)
- Technique and Medium (What materials is it made of? How was it executed? How big or small is it?)
Part II – Brief Description
In a few sentences describe the work. What does it look like? Is it a representation of something? Tell what is shown. Is it an abstraction of something? Tell what the subject is and what aspects are emphasized. Is it a non-objective work? Tell what elements are dominant. This section is not an analysis of the work yet, though some terms used in Part III might be used here. This section is primarily a few sentences to give the reader a sense of what the work looks like.
Part III – Form
This is the key part of your paper. It should be the longest section of the paper. Be sure and think about whether the work of art selected is a two-dimensional or three-dimensional work.
- Line (straight, curved, angular, flowing, horizontal, vertical, diagonal, contour, thick, thin, implied etc.)
- Shape (what shapes are created and how)
- Light and Value (source, flat, strong, contrasting, even, values, emphasis, shadows)
- Color (primary, secondary, mixed, complimentary, warm, cool, decorative, values)
- Texture and Pattern (real, implied, repeating)
- Space (depth, overlapping, kinds of perspective)
- Time and Motion
Principles of Design
- Unity and Variety
- Balance (symmetry, asymmetry)
- Emphasis and Subordination
- Scale and Proportion (weight, how objects or figures relate to each other and the setting)
- Mass/Volume (three-dimensional art)
- Function/Setting (architecture)
- Interior/Exterior Relationship (architecture)
Part IV – Opinions and Conclusions
This is the part of the paper where you go beyond description and offer a conclusion and your own informed opinion about the work. Any statements you make about the work should be based on the analysis in Part III above.
- In this section, discuss how and why the key elements and principles of art used by the artist create meaning.
- Support your discussion of content with facts about the work.
- Pay attention to the date the paper is due.
- Your instructor may have a list of “approved works” for you to write about, and you must be aware of when the UALR Galleries, or the Arkansas Arts Center Galleries, or other exhibition areas, are open to the public.
- You should allow time to view the work you plan to write about and take notes.
- Always italicize or underline titles of works of art. If the title is long, you must use the full title the first time you mention it, but may shorten the title for subsequent listings.
- Use the present tense in describing works of art.
- Be specific: don’t refer to a “picture” or “artwork” if “drawing” or “painting” or “photograph” is more exact.
- Remember that any information you use from another source, whether it be your textbook, a wall panel, a museum catalogue, a dictionary of art, the internet, must be documented with a footnote. Failure to do so is considered plagiarism, and violates the behavioral standards of the university. If you do not understand what plagiarism is, refer to this link at the UALR Copyright Central web site: http://www.ualr.edu/copyright/articles/?ID=4
- For proper footnote form, refer to the UALR Department of Art website, or to Barnet’s A Short Guide to Writing About Art, which is based on the Chicago Manual of Style. MLA style is not acceptable for papers in art history.
- Allow time to proofread your paper. Read it out loud and see if it makes sense. If you need help on the technical aspects of writing, use the University Writing Center (569-8343) or On-Line Writing Lab. http://ualr.edu/writingcenter/
- Ask your instructor for help if needed.
For further information and more discussions about writing a formal analysis, see the following. Some of these sources also give a lot of information about writing a research paper in art history, that is, a paper more ambitious in scope than a formal analysis.
M. Getlein, Gilbert’s Living with Art (10th edition, 2013), pp. 136-139 is a very short analysis of one work.
M. Stokstad and M. W. Cothren, Art History (5th edition, 2014), “Starter Kit,” pp. xxii-xxv is a brief outline.
S. Barnet, A Short Guide to Writing About Art (9th edition, 2008), pp. 113-134 is about formal analysis; the entire book is excellent for all kinds of writing assignments.
R. J. Belton, Art History: A Preliminary Handbookhttp://www.ubc.ca/okanagan/fccs/about/links/resources/arthistory.html is probably more useful for a research paper in art history, but parts of this outline relate to discussing the form of a work of art.
Link to the Exhibition
Pdf files of all submitted assignments are below.
These assignments were compiled in a booklet that was available for all artists in the exhibition, and a group of these assignments were presented by the artists at the Mini-Conference on April 2nd at Monmouth College.
Marin Abell, Washburn University
|File Size:||2456 kb|
Jordan Acker Anderson, Mount Mary University
Josh Anderson, Mount Mary University
|File Size:||5868 kb|
Brian Baugh, Monmouth College
|File Size:||532 kb|
Stephanie J Baugh and Stacy Lotz, Monmouth College
|File Size:||5917 kb|
Jessica Bingham, Bradley University (grad student)
|File Size:||5898 kb|
Heather Brammeier, Bradley University
|File Size:||2611 kb|
Robert Bubp, Wichita State University
|File Size:||3989 kb|
Chung Fan Chang, Stockton University
|File Size:||3680 kb|
Shaila Christofferson, Chicago State University
|File Size:||7076 kb|
John H Clarke, Central Michigan University
John DenHouter, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville
|File Size:||5832 kb|
Dawn Martin Dickins, Middle Tennessee State University
|File Size:||1441 kb|
Adam Fotos, Chicago State University & College of DuPage
|File Size:||1950 kb|
Anita Giddings, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis
|File Size:||2168 kb|
Michael Godsil, Knox College
|File Size:||2911 kb|
Phillip Hanson, Saginaw Valley State University
|File Size:||6487 kb|
Craig Hawkins, Valdosta State University
|File Size:||22019 kb|
David Marshall Hicks, Herron School of Art and Design
|File Size:||1763 kb|
Laura Rodman Huaracha, Carthage College
|File Size:||1117 kb|
Leah Schreiber Johnson, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
|File Size:||790 kb|
David Kamm, Luther College
|File Size:||12124 kb|
Margaret Lanterman, De Paul University
|File Size:||466 kb|
Stacy Lotz, Monmouth College
|File Size:||282 kb|
Damon McArthur, Western Illinois University
Rob Millard-Mendez, University of Southern Indiana
Tybre Newcomer, Monmouth College
Cozette Phillips, Blackhawk College
John Saurer, St. Olaf College
Ian Shelly, Western Illinois University
|File Size:||2833 kb|
Natalie Shelly, Monmouth College
|File Size:||3822 kb|
Emily Sullivan Smith, University of Dayton
|File Size:||1019 kb|
Astri Snodgrass, Richard J. Daley College
|File Size:||8130 kb|
Meredith Starr, Suffolk County Community College
|File Size:||2537 kb|
Diane Staver, the Art Institute of Indianapolis
|File Size:||210 kb|
Tom Suter, Ohio University Southern
Megan Vossler, Macalester College
|File Size:||9195 kb|
Sandra Williams, University of Nebraska, Lincoln
Eric Wold, Clarke University
|File Size:||1820 kb|
Ken Wood, St. Louis Community College
|File Size:||820 kb|
Annie Lee-Zimerle, Cedarville University